• 15:36
  • Wednesday ,24 December 2014
العربية

The Muslim Brotherhood’s International Union for Muslim Scholars

By Right Side News

Copts and Poliltical Islam

00:12

Wednesday ,24 December 2014

The Muslim Brotherhood’s International Union for Muslim Scholars
On December 5, 2014, Interpol issued a “Red Notice” alert, seeking the arrest of Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, at the request of the Egyptian government, on charges including, “Agreement, incitement and assistance to commit intentional murder, helping…prisoners to escape, arson, vandalism and theft.” Qaradawi’s support of terrorism led the United States to ban him from entering the country in 1999. Britain barred his entry in 2008, and France in 2012.
 
Ten days after the Interpol alert was issued, 300 Muslim scholars, members of the International Union for Muslim Scholars, announced: “We reject all the false accusations against Qaradawi.” The Doha-based organization, which is headed by Qaradawi himself, urged Interpol to “rapidly” remove Qaradawi from its most-wanted list, because the warrant is an “insult to Islam and Muslims.”
 
After a half-century of activity in Europe, the most intriguing recent event involving the Muslim Brotherhood occurred in 2003, when Qaradawi, the Egyptian exile and Ikhwan “spiritual guide” and Chairman of the Sunna and Sira Council, in the new home he found in Qatar, proposed the founding of the World Council of Muslim Clerics.
 
Qaradawi was already head of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, a Dublin-based private foundation founded in London in March 1997 on the initiative of the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe. The Federation is the heart of the Muslim Brotherhood movement in Europe.
 
Beginning in the new millennium, Sheikh Qaradawi had indicated that he had new developments in store for the European Continent. In December 2002, he produced a Fatwa calling on Muslims to enter into the conquest of Europe: “Islam will return to Europe as conqueror and a victor after being expelled from it twice [from the south and east].”  He urged Muslims forward to the re-conquest of Andalusia (Spain), southern Italy, Sicily, the Balkans and the Mediterranean islands.  Qaradawi’s Fatwa, which was published in the widely circulated London based Hamas children’s magazine, Al-Fateh (Issue 66), retells the history of Seville and urges children to free it and reinstitute Muslim rule in Spain.
 
Qardawi’s plans for the World Council of Muslim Clerics (WCMC), were not entirely clear in 2003. He announced that the World Council would be headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, at the Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Dublin Mosque & Islamic Centre, which was also home to the Islamic Foundation of Ireland.  In retrospect, the move seemed both historically and geographically strange because the site chosen was located on the periphery of Europe itself.  Observers wondered why Dublin was chosen rather than Geneva, or Munich, or Milan — all hotbeds of Muslim activity.  The choice was never explained.
 
In 2004 top national security advisers have just hosted Sheikh Abdulla bin Bayyah at the White House. As vice president of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS) in 2004, bin Bayyah endorsed a fatwa calling for the killing of American troops and other personnel serving in Iraq.
 
In July 2004 Qaradawi arrived in London in to preside over what was reported to be the first meeting of the WCMC board of Directors.  Prior to that meeting, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood had asked Qaradawi, already the Ikhwan’s spiritual guide, to become the leader (Murshid) of the international Muslim Brotherhood.  But Qaradawi, who for decades had been labeled the Ikhwan’s spiritual leader, refused the offer.  Certainly, he had good reason to fear that his freedom could be jeopardized if he returned to Egypt, where the organization was based. It was also true that accepting the demands of the office would have interfered with the many irons he had in the fire in Europe.  (It was not the first time that the Egyptian exile and noted cleric had refused the offer.)
 
Nothing earth shattering seemed to result from the first WCMC meeting.  Nonetheless, the presence of Qaradawi in London was sufficient to elicit widespread press interest in the mysterious doings of the Ikhwan in Europe and in what was called the “New Platform of the Muslim Brotherhood.” Qaradawi’s announcement that he was a major player in what was called the first “Arab and Islamic Conference in Europe”, planned for Berlin in October 2004, received extra media coverage. Sponsored by a WCMC that had yet to publicly name a board of directors, the object of the Berlin meeting was to send a message of “solidarity to those forgotten people under occupation in Palestine and Iraq.”
 
Unfortunately for Qaradawi and his friends in the Ikhwan, they had endured a long and often unhappy history in Germany. It was no surprise that German Minister of Interior, Otto Schily, applied pressure and the Ikhwan meeting was banned by the Berlin city legislature. Frustrated in Europe, the WCMC next called for a meeting of Islamist intellectuals, which convened in Beirut on 18-19 November 2004.  A fourteen point edict was issued that, inter alia, supported the jihadists in Iraq, opposed the United States presence in the Middle East, demanded the continued struggle against Israel, and urged the use of Muslim law (the sharia) as “an inspiring element” in the reformation of Muslim political, social and economic systems, and endorsed Qaradawi’s fatwa that called urged Muslims to kill American troops and civilians in Iraq.
 
A few days later, in a meeting was held at an undisclosed site in the United Arab Emirates, major Ikhwan personages, including the newly elected Ikhwan Murshid (leader) Muhammad Mahdi Akef, were in attendance. Also present were Qaradawi and Mahmad Izzat, the Secretary of the Brotherhood.  Both Akef and Izzat had received approval from Mubarak’s government to attend the event.  At that time Mubarak had little to fear from the Egyptian Ikhwan, and he must have been satisfied to learn that its Cairo center would not soon be revived as the nexus of Ikhwan power.
 
Akef was a noted Brother and like most Ikhwan leaders had spent time in jail.  After being freed from prison in 1976, he had assumed the role of leader of Egypt’s Ikhwan youth activity.  From the mid-nineteen eighties he next spent time in Germany and in 1993 he moved to the United States.  In March 2004 he had succeeded the Egyptian Judge Mamoun el Hodeibi, and immediately made news by issuing a number of statements calling suicide bombings in Palestine and Iraq a religious obligation. Eyeing the larger world canvas he noted, “I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission.”
 
Unfortunately for the Egyptian Ikhwan, Akef seemed powerless to influence the election of a new head of Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood chapter in Gaza.  Following the death of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin in March 2004, an obituary published in a Cairo newspaper revealed he was “the secret leader of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza” — a secret to very few familiar with the region’s personalities and organizations.  In the months following Yassin’s death it became quite apparent that the Egyptian center under Murshid Mahdi Akef had little influence over events in Gaza.
 
Reportedly, the UAE meeting was held to discuss a number of important issues:  Gaza was, of course, one of them. There was also the issue of financing the Ikhwan in the wake of the disastrous Al Taqwa (Fear of God), banking scandal, The Brotherhood’s Swiss/ Bahamian based financial network whose assets were frozen by the U.S. in November 2001 because it funded terrorism. And there were other problems with the United States where a number of questionable Muslim Brotherhood funding activities had been uncovered.
 
Investigations into Islamic charities located in Falls Church and Herndon, Virginia, showed links between Qaradawi and Al-Taqwa.  An affidavit identified Qaradawi as one of the largest shareholders and a board member of Al Taqwa. Given their support of Al Qaeda, its Ikhwan administrators were given terrorist designations by both the United States and United Nations.
 
During the meeting Qaradawi, the Ikhwan, Saudi and Gulf clerics adopted resolutions against the United States and its war in Iraq. It was leaked that Abdullah al-Motawah, the head of the Kuwait branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and a cleric who despised the United States, supported a peaceful resolution to the conflict with Saddam going into exile.
 
The participants agreed to call the war to be fought against the United States “jihad of self-defense,” adding that this was a general duty of all Muslims and did not require a “universal leadership.”
 
There was also the question whether to agree to dismantle or reorganize the Muslim Brotherhood’s shadowy and apparently ineffective International Council. At that time, it was reported that the Council — an entity that Soviet intelligence claimed had been created by the Egyptian center in 1982 — had been dissolved.  Only after the passage of time did it become clear that the Council had been replaced by Qaradawi’s WCMC.  And it is clear that, at the UAE meeting, Qaradawi put the finishing touches on that organization and obtained the dinars needed to fund such an ambitious undertaking.
 
The International Union Of Muslim Scholars
 
In the aftermath of the UAE meeting it was generally understood that despite the presence of the Egyptian leadership, the Gulf conference had been a Qaradawi show.  In effect, and whether the Egyptians liked it or not, Qaradawi had taken charge of the Muslim Brotherhood.  The center of operations was thus transposed from the claustrophobia of Cairo to Qaradawi’s home in Doha, Qatar.  And without explanation, what first emerged as the World Council of Muslim Clerics soon became the International Association of Muslim Scholars.  Naturally, its headquarters was sited at Doha, Qatar.
 
Certainly, there was substantial confusion that followed in the wake of the 2004 meetings.  It does seem that with respect to Europe itself, the center of Islamist intellectual ferment had been moved from Dublin to Doha.  And while the Western media claimed that radicals had taken charge of the Ikhwan, and despite a Newsweek story that headlined, “The End of the Muslim Brotherhood,” the patient’s heartbeat was still strong.  (Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball, “The End of the Muslim Brotherhood,” Newsweek, 24 November 2004.)